Текст песни Алексей Ивакин - Про историков-либералов

In psychology, there is the concept of & quot; subjective reality & quot ;. In short - each of us sees the world differently. And when there is an event or phenomenon that contradicts this very subjective reality includes protection mechanisms - denial of the fact , projection , interpretation, based on their own ideas and other , other, other ...
   In the minds of historians liberals happens the same.
   To start to define the term - who is a historian and liberal ?
   1.Istorik liberal usually sees past exclusively in black. Everything was bad. All completely .
   2. If something was good , it means contrary to or accidentally .
   3.Tak type usually militant amateur at best , and at worst - an ordinary ignoramus . It is enough to take any document and understand its meaning once and bezpovorotno , based on their interpretations. & quot; I think so , because I have reason to believe ... & quot; - A great phrase , showing the psychological defense mechanism of this historian.
   4.Istorik liberal owns some non-Euclidean logic to understand that it is simply impossible . It is impossible, because it is based not on facts but on the interpretation of the facts, and therefore false. In addition, he uses , for example, such methods - & quot; And prove to me that this was not ? & Quot ;, completely unaware of the existence of & quot; Russell's teapot & quot ;.
   5.Istorichesky methodological apparatus is simply not available . For example, he does not know the concept of & quot; axial time & quot ;, and if known - he does not understand how they can be applied not to the 5th century BC , and by the 20th .
   6.Istorik liberal attributes interlocutor their fabrications and starts them hard to refute . Object such arguments is very difficult. In fact. And prove that you stopped drinking in the morning?
   7.On expert in all the humanities. But a complete zero technical . The numbers he does not take it for granted . He was more interested in the interpretation of these numbers.
   
   In fact, these features fellow goes on and on .
   Talking with them, I came to the conclusion that very amusing - communicating with them , we must remember that they are living in a totally different world. When they discover that they are in objective reality - are struggling to turn it into his own. Their main method - imposing their systems around the world by any means .
   The main way - this mythologizing memory. Known wave of lawsuits that swept the US in patients 70-80 years of psychoanalysis to their fathers for sexual harassment . Freud's theory suggests incestuous desire for his father 's daughter , a son to his mother. Passing rate & quot; treat & quot; a psychoanalyst people know about it , and begins to interpret the events of his childhood in terms of Herr Freud . Mom washed three year old son in the bathroom? Definitely harassment. Dad shook his five-year daughter on his lap ? What do you mean , mister! This is pedophilia ! And some & quot; memory & quot; generally designed .
   And in history.
   What myths are trying to build in our memory aliens from another world ?
   ( At the moment, when I write these lines, I deliberately disconnected from the Internet , but would not use statistical and documentary evidence . I will try to talk with historians , amateurs, sorry liberals in their own language - & quot; alogical & quot;)
   
   Myth 1. After the Gulag passed 70 million people and all of them died there .
   
   Here is useless statistics show the NKVD. For they forged. I have no idea why the NKVD had to forge documents . I can not understand , which makes forgery NKVDshnik that time.
   Let's see the logic . In the camp, died the day 10 people. The camp commander wrote the memo - that supposedly died 5 people , not 10. Why ??? A regional department reduce the number to three. In Moscow, even up to 1 ? What's the point ?
   The only argument that met - and that would be to get these prisoners food and sell it .
   To Whom ??? Bears on the Kolyma ?
   B